But we already know computers can ingest and accurately/permanently store information at speeds orders of magnitude greater than human brains can - to take an e

But we already know computers can ingest and accurately/permanently store information at speeds orders of magnitude greater than human brains can - to take an extreme example it takes years and years for a particularly dedicated human to memorize several thousand digits of "pi" (and then many hours to recite then again!), yet you can feed the same digits to a computer in well under a second and it will hold onto them indefinitely with instant and perfect recall. So I don't think it really makes sense to compare a silicon-based AI model that's been trained explicitly for, say, 6 or 12 months and a human that's been passively absorbing information for 20 or even 40 years.