4 ms·

Have you tried Bingchat yet? It’s rumoured to be using a more advanced model from OAI than ChatGPT or Davinci and is very often surprisingly excellent.

by napier 4y ago

nico 4y ago
Keep reading great things about it. Will have to try it. Thank you for the recommendation!
wetpaws 4y ago
It is so low heavily lobotomized that 99% I find much better results with chatgpt even though it is technically an older model.
- nirav72 4y ago
  I've noticed the same thing. Other than generating code examples - I found it be useless for search. I've had better luck using a third-party extension that inserts web search context into the ChatGPT than using Bing chat to search for something.
  - nico 4y ago
    Could you mention or link the extension here? Thank you!
    - nirav72 4y ago
      Sure. The one I'm using is WebChatGPT: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/webchatgpt-chatgpt-with-i/lpfemeioodjbpieminkklglpmhlngfcn https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/webchatgpt-chatgpt... Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/web-chatgpt/?utm_source=addons.mozilla.org&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=search https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/web-chatgpt/?... note - I haven't tried the firefox version. But the chrome one works fine in Brave. Edit: Source for the above extension: https://github.com/qunash/chatgpt-advanced https://github.com/qunash/chatgpt-advanced
beauzero 4y ago
I was pretty decent early on. Now I just use it to augment copilot...generally when I don't have a specific "start" but just an idea...works better than dumping a comment into copilot. I was hoping with the 3 tabs creative -> more exact it would be a little better but I haven't seen any difference. It isn't quite as interesting as when it was regularly hallucinating. I found the hallucinations to bubble up inspiration...forgotten facts, unused paths, etc.

Have you tried Bingchat yet? It’s rumoured to be using a more advanced model from OAI than ChatGPT or Davinci and is very often surprisingly excellent.

by napier 4y ago

Have you tried Bingchat yet? It’s rumoured to be using a more advanced model from OAI than ChatGPT or Davinci and is very often surprisingly excellent.

nico 4y ago

Keep reading great things about it. Will have to try it. Thank you for the recommendation!

wetpaws 4y ago

It is so low heavily lobotomized that 99% I find much better results with chatgpt even though it is technically an older model.

nirav72 4y ago
I've noticed the same thing. Other than generating code examples - I found it be useless for search. I've had better luck using a third-party extension that inserts web search context into the ChatGPT than using Bing chat to search for something.
- nico 4y ago
  Could you mention or link the extension here? Thank you!
  - nirav72 4y ago
    Sure. The one I'm using is WebChatGPT: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/webchatgpt-chatgpt-with-i/lpfemeioodjbpieminkklglpmhlngfcn https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/webchatgpt-chatgpt... Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/web-chatgpt/?utm_source=addons.mozilla.org&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=search https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/web-chatgpt/?... note - I haven't tried the firefox version. But the chrome one works fine in Brave. Edit: Source for the above extension: https://github.com/qunash/chatgpt-advanced https://github.com/qunash/chatgpt-advanced

beauzero 4y ago

I was pretty decent early on. Now I just use it to augment copilot...generally when I don't have a specific "start" but just an idea...works better than dumping a comment into copilot. I was hoping with the 3 tabs creative -> more exact it would be a little better but I haven't seen any difference. It isn't quite as interesting as when it was regularly hallucinating. I found the hallucinations to bubble up inspiration...forgotten facts, unused paths, etc.