4 ms·
You think that the argument that LLMs should have the standard tort liability as anything else, and not a special 230-style carve-out, means that LLMs need to b
by jxdxbx 4y ago
You think that the argument that LLMs should have the standard tort liability as anything else, and not a special 230-style carve-out, means that LLMs need to be "baby-proofed"? It just means they should be treated like any other consumer product, and not like social media.
- nhchris 4y agoIf by "any other consumer product" you mean a magic 8-ball, then I agree.