3 ms·
We have history to help us answer your question. The answer is: yes, people returned to many places after they were totally demolished, suffered from systemati
by playingalong 4y ago
We have history to help us answer your question.
The answer is: yes, people returned to many places after they were totally demolished, suffered from systematic resource drainage and were background of inhumane genocides.
TLDR: massive scale war is nothing new.
Sadly
- lotsofpulp 4y agoBut you also have people that do not? My entire parents’ generation immigrated thousands of miles away to various places around the world and never went back (other than as tourists), and it was not even war torn or lacking in resources. They just happened to bet that they could provide a better life for themselves and their children elsewhere.
- rayiner 4y agoYes, and they’re a distinct minority. Polling shows that even if they had the opportunity to go somewhere else, overwhelming majorities of people in Asia and Africa wouldn’t leave their homeland. Even in sub-Saharan Africa just a third of the population would leave if they could: https://news.gallup.com/poll/245255/750-million-worldwide-migrate.aspx https://news.gallup.com/poll/245255/750-million-worldwide-mi.... In east and south Asia it’s under 10%. This is, in my view, one of the reasons america is so culturally weird. It’s generation after generation of the most antisocial families from other countries.