> They're absolutely dealing with that situation as well. That's why I said they were prioritizing. The very use of that word obviously means they are not just

> They're absolutely dealing with that situation as well. That's why I said they were prioritizing. The very use of that word obviously means they are not just working on one thing.... Why do you keep arguing against strawmen? I won't address your scenario because you chose one that is overly favorable to your point, it doesn't really show anything. > If we're assuming an attacker can run things as root, then obviously we have to assume that they can run things in an unconfined context as well, That's a really, really dumb assumption, because that kind of issue is addressed. It's an entirely different user from root that administers selinux policies....no reason at all to assume root can run unconfined when that's counter to the whole point of running SELinux.... These are really, really bad arguments you are making.