5 ms·
The issue with the modern apartment building noise, in my estimation, isn't wood construction (which is commonly blamed), but ducts. The double-loaded corridor
by scythe 4y ago
The issue with the modern apartment building noise, in my estimation, isn't wood construction (which is commonly blamed), but ducts. The double-loaded corridor requires extra ventilation per fire code. The demand for central air conditioning implies ducts. A properly designed double-stud wooden wall can have a Sound Transmission Class higher than 60, but a small hole in a wall can cut the STC by as much as 30. The presence of a large void in the wall (duct) could severely reduce the efficacy of the sound insulation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_Transmission_Class#Sound_leakage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_Transmission_Class#Sound_...
The apartment buildings I've lived in without central A/C (in Atlanta and San Francisco) were consistently quieter than the ones with central A/C. Underfloor radiant heating and wall A/C units might be a better way to design apartment buildings. Removing climate control from the access corridor and letting it vent to the outside would reduce the need for sprinklers and complex ventilation. This is slightly less energy efficient, but apartment buildings are already way more energy efficient than houses, and anything that makes apartments more livable can increase the efficiency of the whole society by increasing people's willingness to live in apartments.
- rcme 4y agoYou shouldn't be sharing any air with you neighbors, so I doubt ducts are to blame. You can build highly sound-proof timber-framed walls, but most people don't because it's more expensive. Like everything in modern construction, the cheapest permissible option usually wins. > The apartment buildings I've lived in without central A/C (in Atlanta and San Francisco) were consistently quieter than the ones with central A/C. When were the units built?
- cwzwarich 4y ago> You can build highly sound-proof timber-framed walls, but most people don't because it's more expensive. Like everything in modern construction, the cheapest permissible option usually wins. Especially when reduced cost is the reason mid-rise wood construction became popular in the first place.
- unethical_ban 4y agoI don't think it's about sharing air. It's about the duct being in the wall at all.
- rcme 4y agoYou can puts ducts in a soffit so they don't necessarily need to be inside the walls. I've lived in two apartments with ducts inside soffits. Both were still very loud.
- scythe 4y agoA soffit must necessarily pass through the wall. Unless it is well-designed, it could cause the same problem.
- rcme 4y agoIt passes though a wall, but not necessarily a wall you'd share with a neighbor typically. For instance, in my apartment we had an in-unit air handler with soffits running long the ceiling. We could hear every step on neighbors made. Most building codes require fire separation between units, so you generally wouldn't have duct work running through walls like that as it'd be a path for fire to spread.
- scythe 4y agoHow old was the building? Currently I'm in a noisy building — it was built in 1890, before rock wool was invented, to say nothing of fiberglass. It definitely tracks that floors tend to be worse than walls (especially bad with Euclidean zoning that encourages low ceilings and thin platforms).
- rcme 4y agoThe building was built in the 90s. Ultimately, the construction was very cheap.
- scythe 4y ago>When were the units built? 1962 (Atlanta) and 1978 (San Francisco).
- valine 4y agoI think the issue is that the people building wood apartments aren’t the same people who care enough to ensure there are no small holes in the wall.
- rr888 4y agoActually its a good thing about our condo is independent heat pumps per unit so everyone gets their own air handler and ducts. Its expensive to replace each one individuall though.