4 ms·
We definitely used datadog to monitor internal systems while I was there many years ago. Dogfooding was a celebrated practice and I'd be surprised to learn that
by vageli 4y ago
We definitely used datadog to monitor internal systems while I was there many years ago. Dogfooding was a celebrated practice and I'd be surprised to learn that it's changed.
- ollien 4y agoI have to assume it's a separate stack from what is used in production?
- electric_sheep 4y agoI remember listening to Charity Majors[1] talk about this on a podcast -- in the case of Honeycomb they have a "dogfood" cluster than monitors production, and a "kibble" cluster that monitors the dogfood. Cute, but it gets the point across: watchmen for the watchmen, with each layer slightly less mission-critical than the last. [1] https://changelog.com/shipit/11#transcript-98 https://changelog.com/shipit/11#transcript-98