Let me alter this a bit: "So if you argue that we can use a human to make a fact checker then I agree. It is unclear how accurate they would be, but at least t

Let me alter this a bit: "So if you argue that we can use a human to make a fact checker then I agree. It is unclear how accurate they would be, but at least then we have someone that tries to evaluate truthiness. But the human itself doesn't use such a layer, so they don't have a truth model." It reads to me that you presume that "a fact checking layer" must be a dedicated thing and can't be just an application of a general conversation. It also seems that you presume that humans have such a special fact-checking layer, other than just an application of general conversaion (cause you say that humans have a truth model, cause a truth model can't exist without this layer). Why are you making that assumption?