2 ms·
I like your example of sugar tits, because it shows exactly how you have been coaxed into buying a product that is not what you think it is. "Sugar tits" is so
by low_tech_love 4y ago
I like your example of sugar tits, because it shows exactly how you have been coaxed into buying a product that is not what you think it is. "Sugar tits" is so obviously wrong that it is not in any list. It's the same as someone else earlier in this thread who said that not allowing racial slurs is a good thing. Of course it's a good thing; that's so obvious that most common racial slurs are not in any of these lists. Instead they put things like "three amigos" or "war games", because what they are trying to show you is that you need them. It becomes so hard to decide exactly what is ok and what is not that they convince you that you need them to tell you what to do. It is a way to justify their existence. However, the jump from "sugar tits" or racial slurs to "three amigos" and "war games" is simply too large. To be honest, I think that anyone who is actually worried about this problem should be the first to criticize these people, because they are using your perfectly fine motivations in order to fuel their own career and social advancement. By pushing everything to meaningless extremes, they are making your perfectly fine motivations disappear amidst chaotic noise.