3 ms·

Char is the byte type in C (and thus C++), both in theory and in practice. The problem it is a very overloaded type: as a char type it is used for strings, as a

Char is the byte type in C (and thus C++), both in theory and in practice. The problem it is a very overloaded type: as a char type it is used for strings, as an integral type is used as a small integer, and, as it is blessed with special semantics (strict aliasing and sizeof(char) = 1), it is also the byte type. Technically C++ now does indeed have a blessed byte type (std::type). But it is not an integral type: it support bitwise operations but not artihmetic ops, so signedness doesn't come into the picture.

account42 4y ago
> Char is the byte type in C (and thus C++), both in theory Not an 8-bit byte which is the definition most people think of when talking about bytes and the only one that matters once you need to interact with other systems. > and in practice. Yes. > Technically C++ now does indeed have a blessed byte type (std::type). But it is not an integral type: it support bitwise operations but not artihmetic ops, so signedness doesn't come into the picture. Its signedness does matter for casts to integral types - int(std::byte(255)) == 255 whereas int(char(255)) is implemenation-defined.