> The current narrative, that it was a faction of the Ukraine, seems the most plausible to me. Russia had no incentive to blow it up either. But why would a Uk

> The current narrative, that it was a faction of the Ukraine, seems the most plausible to me. Russia had no incentive to blow it up either. But why would a Ukrainian faction not publicly claim the biggest successful sabotage act against Russian infrastructure? Ukrainian side had no qualms about claiming the Crimea bridge sabotage, or drone strikes deep in Russian territory.