> Important implication: It’s common but not necessarily always useful to say the language model “knows” What does the author think knowing actually is if not

> Important implication: It’s common but not necessarily always useful to say the language model “knows” What does the author think knowing actually is if not a convergence of probability distributions? I'd like for all these "let me explain to you how things work" type write ups to first define what their understanding of the key preexisting concepts are (like what it is to know something). So when they try to explain the new concepts I don't waste my time learning concepts formed on a flawed understanding of their foundational counterparts.