> The Big Bang theory itself has many other problems that the mainstream scientific community continue to ignore and paper over. The latest evidence from the la

> The Big Bang theory itself has many other problems that the mainstream scientific community continue to ignore and paper over. The latest evidence from the latest deep space telescope do not sit well with established science. They will not be able the hide the non-cosmological redshift skeleton for much longer. Not to disappoint you, but the latest evidence you are talking about is more of a problem for the people studying galaxy formation than it is for the Big Bang theory. The evidence for the Big Bang is very solid. We can literally see the state of the Universe when all matter has been a hot, dense plasma. I fully expect some details to be ironed out, but that spacetime started with a (near) singularity is extremely well established and I wouldn't expect that to change. Don't think redshift is the only or even the best evidence for the Big Bang.