> It allows Super PACs to collect unlimited donations to run campaign ads supporting or opposing specific candidates. That may open the door to corruption in a

> It allows Super PACs to collect unlimited donations to run campaign ads supporting or opposing specific candidates. That may open the door to corruption in a certain sense, but it doesn't allow quid pro quo on active legislation. If the Citizens United decision did not allow Super PACs to talk about supporting or opposing candidates based on their actions with regard to particular legislation, then I was wrong. But that would mean Dodd committed a particularly egregious violation of the law in public. I don't think he would do that, and I think you were wrong to say I was wrong.