4 ms·
Pretty sure you wouldn’t see anyone using it commercially as IIRC it’s only public due to a leak.
by KyeRussell 4y ago
Pretty sure you wouldn’t see anyone using it commercially as IIRC it’s only public due to a leak.
- mrtksn 4y agoI wasn't looking for a commercial use but its an Interesting point. Would it be possible to prove that someone is using it commercially? 1) Spin it up on a cluster in Belarus 2) ??? 3) Profit?
- qingdao99 4y agoIt could be watermarked
- mrtksn 4y agohow?
- qingdao99 4y agohttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.10226.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.10226.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZJc1p6RE78 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZJc1p6RE78
- mrtksn 4y agocool, thanks
- ad404b8a372f2b9 4y agoThat emoji attack is hilarious, who would have thought that twitter-speak is watermark resistant.
- notpushkin 4y ago4) Lukashenka grabs your profits and kicks you out ;-)
- mrtksn 4y agoWhy would he do that? More likely scenario would be "gets his share as a an apartment in London".
- mylidlpony 4y agoThat's the oldest authoritarian trick in the book, pretty much any successful business in russia got the same fate for example. They even tried it with nginx.
- input_sh 4y agoIt's not a leak, it's a shortcut. You can download it from Facebook, but it's behind "apply for access" form. Magnet links floating around are just a workaround around that form. That said, commercial use is forbidden by the license specified in the form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfqNECQnMkycAp2jP4Z9TFX0cGR4uf7b_fBxjY_OjhJILlKGA/viewform https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfqNECQnMkycAp2jP4Z...