> Gas peaker plants solve the problem, with no additional costs. > We don't have to get carbon production to zero. If we run the gas plants even as much as 10%

> Gas peaker plants solve the problem, with no additional costs. > We don't have to get carbon production to zero. If we run the gas plants even as much as 10% of the time for no-sun-no-wind-flat-batteries conditions, you've still cut 90% of carbon emissions. And now instead of paying for the expense nuclear power plant, you have to pay: - Pay for 3x the raw capacity of the plant in solar and wind because they never run at peak capacity - Pay for the battery for storage - Pay for the Gas power plant that will never be cost effective because running 10% of the time. And you still emit more CO2 than a damn nuclear power plant.