2 ms·

> Not a single Stone inscription, Copper plate, Terracotta inscription of classical sanskrit has ever been found nor any Hindu site Ok here you go. https://en

> Not a single Stone inscription, Copper plate, Terracotta inscription of classical sanskrit has ever been found nor any Hindu site Ok here you go. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hathibada_Ghosundi_inscriptions#:~:text=Dated%20to%20the%201st%2Dcentury,of%20ancient%20India%2C%20particularly%20Vaishnavism https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hathibada_Ghosundi_inscripti.... > All those sanskrit books of Hindus religion were written much later infact they couldnt be written before teh invention of Devanagari script. Sanskrit is script agnostic language so Sanskrit manuscript are found in every Indian script. If you do not know this then you are not qualified to talk about Sanskrit. Edit: Hinduism is neither doctrine based nor centralised so every single purana and upnishad isn't authentic. Hindus and are free to discard what doesn't align with Dharma as described in Vedas. What make you think Allopnishad wasn't written by Muslims to convince Hindus?

pankajdoharey 4y ago
First of all you clearly have no clue that the Modern Classical Sanskrit is a newer language an earlier language existed known as BHS(Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit) this language was written in a script older than Devanagri script. There are ample Buddhists manuscripts of this language written in various scripts like Kharoshti. Why do we not find a single Brahman Dharm manuscript? Simply because much of (Brahman Dharm) Hinduism was invented after the invention of Devanagri script in 11 century. Also The classical sanskrit in which all Brahman Text (Hindu text) is written cannot be written in any Indian script before 11th century. Simply because the very basic sounds of sanskrit "Chha" (छ), "Tri" (त्र), "Gya"(ज्ञ), compound sounds, halants and visargas are not present in any script before that. In the end what is the basis of your claim? All your claims are sand castles without archaeological evidence which is non existent for Brahman Dharm (Hinduism). Vedas dont prescribe anything in terms of rejecting books, 33% of Rig Veda is only talk fire burning rituals and Indra, i suggest you first read it before speaking about it. You must also address Bhavishya Puran.
- sudhirc 4y ago
  > Simply because the very basic sounds of sanskrit "Chha" (छ), "Tri" (त्र), "Gya"(ज्ञ), compound sounds, halants and visargas are not present in any script before .... Wrong Brahmi was capable of representing Sanskrit sounds. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmi_script https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmi_script > Simply because much of (Brahman Dharm) Hinduism was invented after the invention of Devanagri script in 11 century. With this statement you have denied the foundational claim of Buddhism. You have also disowned numerous philosopher of Buddhism. If Sanatan Dharma didn't exist what exactly was being reformed by Buddha? > Also The classical sanskrit in which all Brahman Text (Hindu text) is written cannot be written in any Indian script before 11th century. Classical Sanskrit?? Are you claiming Vedas were written in classical Sanskrit? Then Vedic Sanskrit was used for exactly what? Vedic books are transmitted in Vedic Sanskrit which had more sounds than classical Sanskrit. On top of that Vedas are shruti (heard) and they are transmitted orally even to this day.I hope you know about 6 pre- requisite (vedangas)required to read Vedas . First vedanga is Sikhsa which si about correct pronunciati. Chandas comes second and defines the metre of the Vedic hymns. > Vedas dont prescribe anything in terms of rejecting books, 33% of Rig Veda is only talk fire burning rituals and Indra ... Which part of veda teaches commandment and asks the followers to be the blind followers? What is wrong in 33% of rigved praising universe and nature. Is regressive but Buddh vandana is progressive? > You must also address Bhavishya Puran. Produce the questionable reference first and then we can debate. On that note you also address the birth based castism and misogyny of Buddhism. Ariguttara Nikaya (II.35) "beings/ puggalas" are of four categories: a)tamo tama parayano, of miserable birth and bound for misery b)tamo jyoti parayano, of miserable birth but bound for happiness c)joti tama parayano, of happy, good birth but bound for misery https://ia800205.us.archive.org/11/items/pt1samyuttanikay00paliuoft/pt1samyuttanikay00paliuoft.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwielOT70tP9AhWzzzgGHUIbCfoQFnoECCkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3avpj7Z7w7KC40k2XQ0rMN https://ia800205.us.archive.org/11/items/pt1samyuttanikay00p... I can produce more references directly from Buddhist text. I challenge to do the same from Vedas and related text. Regarding your 11th century claim. Brahmin produced Vedas, upvedas, vedangas, upnishads, brahman granths, aranykad, arthshastras,plays and poetry of kalidas,bharthari, numerous astronomy, mathematics books, 6 schools of philosophy, Ramayana, Mahabharata, Bhagwad Gita 11th century onwards when India was attacks from the invaders. I nstead of defending kingdoms, these large projects were started by the ruling class.

pankajdoharey 4y ago

First of all you clearly have no clue that the Modern Classical Sanskrit is a newer language an earlier language existed known as BHS(Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit) this language was written in a script older than Devanagri script. There are ample Buddhists manuscripts of this language written in various scripts like Kharoshti. Why do we not find a single Brahman Dharm manuscript? Simply because much of (Brahman Dharm) Hinduism was invented after the invention of Devanagri script in 11 century. Also The classical sanskrit in which all Brahman Text (Hindu text) is written cannot be written in any Indian script before 11th century. Simply because the very basic sounds of sanskrit "Chha" (छ), "Tri" (त्र), "Gya"(ज्ञ), compound sounds, halants and visargas are not present in any script before that. In the end what is the basis of your claim? All your claims are sand castles without archaeological evidence which is non existent for Brahman Dharm (Hinduism). Vedas dont prescribe anything in terms of rejecting books, 33% of Rig Veda is only talk fire burning rituals and Indra, i suggest you first read it before speaking about it. You must also address Bhavishya Puran.

sudhirc 4y ago
> Simply because the very basic sounds of sanskrit "Chha" (छ), "Tri" (त्र), "Gya"(ज्ञ), compound sounds, halants and visargas are not present in any script before .... Wrong Brahmi was capable of representing Sanskrit sounds. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmi_script https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmi_script > Simply because much of (Brahman Dharm) Hinduism was invented after the invention of Devanagri script in 11 century. With this statement you have denied the foundational claim of Buddhism. You have also disowned numerous philosopher of Buddhism. If Sanatan Dharma didn't exist what exactly was being reformed by Buddha? > Also The classical sanskrit in which all Brahman Text (Hindu text) is written cannot be written in any Indian script before 11th century. Classical Sanskrit?? Are you claiming Vedas were written in classical Sanskrit? Then Vedic Sanskrit was used for exactly what? Vedic books are transmitted in Vedic Sanskrit which had more sounds than classical Sanskrit. On top of that Vedas are shruti (heard) and they are transmitted orally even to this day.I hope you know about 6 pre- requisite (vedangas)required to read Vedas . First vedanga is Sikhsa which si about correct pronunciati. Chandas comes second and defines the metre of the Vedic hymns. > Vedas dont prescribe anything in terms of rejecting books, 33% of Rig Veda is only talk fire burning rituals and Indra ... Which part of veda teaches commandment and asks the followers to be the blind followers? What is wrong in 33% of rigved praising universe and nature. Is regressive but Buddh vandana is progressive? > You must also address Bhavishya Puran. Produce the questionable reference first and then we can debate. On that note you also address the birth based castism and misogyny of Buddhism. Ariguttara Nikaya (II.35) "beings/ puggalas" are of four categories: a)tamo tama parayano, of miserable birth and bound for misery b)tamo jyoti parayano, of miserable birth but bound for happiness c)joti tama parayano, of happy, good birth but bound for misery https://ia800205.us.archive.org/11/items/pt1samyuttanikay00paliuoft/pt1samyuttanikay00paliuoft.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwielOT70tP9AhWzzzgGHUIbCfoQFnoECCkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3avpj7Z7w7KC40k2XQ0rMN https://ia800205.us.archive.org/11/items/pt1samyuttanikay00p... I can produce more references directly from Buddhist text. I challenge to do the same from Vedas and related text. Regarding your 11th century claim. Brahmin produced Vedas, upvedas, vedangas, upnishads, brahman granths, aranykad, arthshastras,plays and poetry of kalidas,bharthari, numerous astronomy, mathematics books, 6 schools of philosophy, Ramayana, Mahabharata, Bhagwad Gita 11th century onwards when India was attacks from the invaders. I nstead of defending kingdoms, these large projects were started by the ruling class.