2 ms·
80s, 90s, not sure we need to make a big difference there. Since then I think what you're seeing is more of a fracturing than an overall increase or decrease i
by majormajor 4y ago
80s, 90s, not sure we need to make a big difference there.
Since then I think what you're seeing is more of a fracturing than an overall increase or decrease in prudishness.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-interview/the-sex-scene-is-dead-long-live-the-sex-scene https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-interview/t... This talks about the small-screen stuff (and indie film) and dicks like you link out; but also points out the shift in mainstream cinema.
There's no more dicks or even breasts in tentpole blockbusters or the increasingly-adult-embraced "kids" films than there used to be. Even your R-rated stuff tends to have less of the sort of "coincidental" not-central-to-the-plot sex scenes than you would've seen a few decades ago. But what's left blockbuster film has found a place in "prestige TV" and by being moved less front-and-center, take-the-family-to-the-theater, it's been able to be amplified since entertainment as a whole is more fractured and it's less one-size-fits-all.
- stcroixx 4y agoI assume this is to sanitize the big blockbusters for the Chinese market.