3 ms·
In case you're thinking you saw this before, there was similar article a month ago in Time: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34646361 https://news.ycombina
by skybrian 4y ago
In case you're thinking you saw this before, there was similar article a month ago in Time:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34646361 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34646361
- d0mine 4y agoIt looks like a hit piece. Someone is against rationality regarding the question of AI safety (any real practical consequences is to censor AI under _pretense_ of AI safety, Perhaps, the articles are the preventive strikes to discredit the AI safety experts that might point out the obvious).
- skybrian 4y agoThat's a rather specific accusation to make without evidence. Possibly, a journalist might have other reasons to cover a story? Not necessarily good ones, but still...
- d0mine 4y agoThe article itself is the evidence: read it and apply common sense. I know almost nothing about EAs but what I know makes me think that it is likely P(SA)>P(SA|EA)>0.