I think lost in all of this is the fact that Twitter had a very healthy business before the acquisition. Were they as successful as Meta? No. Were they sustaina

I think lost in all of this is the fact that Twitter had a very healthy business before the acquisition. Were they as successful as Meta? No. Were they sustainable and growing? Yes. It's the debt that Elon took up, which he unloaded onto the company balance sheet, to buy Twitter that ended up forcing Twitter to cut costs. If you read the Twitter comments whenever Musk blasts ex-Twitter employees, you'd think that Twitter prior to Musk was on the verge of bankruptcy. Quite the opposite. It's Musk's loans used to buy Twitter that is causing Twitter to be on the verge of bankruptcy. Everyone came out as a loser in the deal - except shareholders who sold Twitter way above its actual worth.