You've modified your original comment (which I didn't know Hackernews allowed people to do). So now I look completely weird because it "seems" you only typed on

You've modified your original comment (which I didn't know Hackernews allowed people to do). So now I look completely weird because it "seems" you only typed one word and I wrote something. You wrote, essentially: Why not train a LLM AI on the magazines, newsletters, documentation, etc, and have it generate the descriptions based on prompts? ...and I call this an "unfunded mandate", which is where someone comes along to a project, and tells them a bunch of things they should take on and do, instead of either offering to do something themselves, or pointing to a resource or project that fulfils the need that is being asked for. The article is about me finding out that certain kinds of activities are jammed in a Catch-22 of necessity but lack of potential funding (time or money). Your idea shifts no needle and makes things more complicated, to no greater chance of success, but plenty of chance (contemporarily) of hallucination and misleading results. Feel free to delete, I guess, even more.