3 ms·
@shervin @pmarca: Utilitarianism is bad: It encourages mortal men to play God at levels of complexity that they can't possibly comprehend. It should be banned
by noloblo 4y ago
@shervin @pmarca: Utilitarianism is bad:
It encourages mortal men to play God at levels of complexity that they can't possibly comprehend.
It should be banned for the greater good
>> “earning to give,” the idea that people like Bankman-Fried should do whatever it takes to make a lot of money so they can give it away. To amass his billions, Bankman-Fried allegedly defrauded his customers, and critics have said his downfall shows that EA is vulnerable to a myopia that allows the ends to justify illegal means. Among EAs themselves, however, the most salient criticism is subtler: that living at the logical extremes of the ideology is impractical and a recipe for misery.
In buddhism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Way https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Way middle way is advised for this very reason
- drdeca 4y agoUtilitarianism is false, but I think it is a very useful heuristic, where I think it being used (as a heuristic) more often would probably be beneficial at the margins. There is no canonical way the aggregate utility between persons, and people probably don’t actually have utility functions. And, there are moral laws which should have at the least some weight when weighed against a “but this action seems to have better outcomes overall, on average”, and possibly infinite weight when weighed against such things. Nevertheless.