3 ms·
How many sources would you like? Of course it’s not going to be on the same order as literally dumping raw sewage into the surrounding area. But there is an en
by stouset 4y ago
How many sources would you like?
Of course it’s not going to be on the same order as literally dumping raw sewage into the surrounding area. But there is an enormous body of research demonstrating the overall drain of resources from economically-productive urban areas out to costly suburban ones.
Then there’s the carbon cost of enormous, congested highways and stroads where people idle in traffic for hours of their day. Or the overall inefficiency of providing general city services (water, power, sewer) to people in comparatively sparse areas (which ties back into the resource drain imposed on denser areas).
- elbigbad 4y agoI would, personally, love to read at least one source. Which you didn’t even provide for some reason. And I mean that, I would happily read any source you provide, with a preference for more academic sources.
- stouset 4y agoOne it is. Link to original academic source is in the first sentence. https://cayimby.org/sprawl-costs-the-u-s-1-trillion-every-year/ https://cayimby.org/sprawl-costs-the-u-s-1-trillion-every-ye... Actually I’m an overachiever. Let’s do two! Direct academic reference. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3325575 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3325575
- PopAlongKid 4y agoFrom the first link: "reduce the productivity of nearby lands, for example, by [...] driving up land prices beyond what local residents can afford." What nonsense is this?