4 ms·
Unless there is an available demo that I can provide input to, I am not impressed by AI papers any more. It is pretty easy to have a model that works well with
by RcouF1uZ4gsC 4y ago
Unless there is an available demo that I can provide input to, I am not impressed by AI papers any more. It is pretty easy to have a model that works well with carefully crafted test data and then completely falls down with real world data.
ChatGPT capture the popular imagination because people could try it out themselves with their input.
- narrator 4y agoGoogle is too scared to give anyone a model that can do anything interesting. They won't even help the U.S government make autonomous weapons. It's like they are a priesthood of AI like Asimov's Second Foundation that is waiting for a glorious time in the future when it's ok for the foundation to release these great secrets and avoid a dark age or something.
- chordalkeyboard 4y ago> They won't even help the U.S government make autonomous weapons. This is a good thing.
- kerpotgh 4y ago[dead]
- renewiltord 4y agoIdeally, people like me have access to these LLMs and successors and others don't. For instance, I appear to be in some sixth sigma of LLM users judging by HN comments. HN users are frequently dumbfounded by LLM errors but I can use the tools successfully even accounting for some errors. I find Copilot, ChatGPT, Bing AI, and Perplexity useful and pay for the first two and use them every day. HN users seem unable to get the utility I do out of these tools and frequently find their objectives stymied by the tools' responses. Put simply, the average HN user cannot handle the tool, judging by many comments on LLM threads. And that's with a computer-savvy user. Imagine the inability of the non-HN-user when faced with a talking computer.
- qualudeheart 4y agoThat’s a good thing. While it can train a new model to obliterate your old job much faster than you can go back to grad school, they mercifully do not do so.