4 ms·
> I wouldn't be surprised if they are ignoring those complaints because there's no one left to process them. Maybe, but Facebook is arguing otherwise: “ Accor
by mr_toad 4y ago
> I wouldn't be surprised if they are ignoring those complaints because there's no one left to process them.
Maybe, but Facebook is arguing otherwise:
“ According to Meta, this isn’t just a case of another domain name registrar ignoring abuse complaints because it’s bad for business. The lawsuit alleges that the owners of Freenom “are part of a web of companies created to facilitate cybersquatting, all for the benefit of Freenom.””
- pjerem 4y agoAllegations are not proofs.
- shapefrog 4y ago“We believe that the genocide against Rohingya was possible only because of Facebook,” (all for the benefit of Facebook) Happy to see other allegations aired out, especially when the consequences are a little more than squatting .tk domains (I suspect the real problem is those pesky .ml domains).
- WhyNotHugo 4y ago> The lawsuit alleges that the owners of Freenom “are part of a web of companies created to facilitate cybersquatting, all for the benefit of Freenom.”” I'm looking forward to seeing them present evidence to back this alegation.