3 ms·
I think the article is buying into the notion that the web can never be as rich an experience as the native application. I think that the last few years of exp
by steder 15y ago
I think the article is buying into the notion that the web can never be as rich an experience as the native application. I think that the last few years of explosive growth in terms of cloud services and web applications have made it pretty clear that web applications are a viable alternative. Why won't web applications work for mobile devices as well?
Is the argument simply that the app market is less crowded? Is a comparison of the number of websites on the internet(apples) to the number of android applications(oranges) that compelling?
- jarcoal 15y agoI don't think the web can ever be as fast moving as a native environment. That's one of the major downfalls with being compatible with all platforms.
- rzbn 15y agoFor most apps the speed that the web provides is going to be sufficient however there are some resource intensive apps like games that will stay on the native environment. Just like the desktop os. Even games on the native environment is being challenged by OnLive.
- rafcavallaro 15y agoAdd to this the fact that it is very much in the interest of one of the larger mobile players, Apple, to keep the native experience superior to the html5 mobile browser experience in order to differentiate their iOS offering from a generic "mobile web browser." For example, WebGL is only available for iAds, not for mobile Safari web apps, while openGL is of course available to native iOS apps.