> websites should be held responsible for the data they serve Isn't this exactly the root of the section 230 debate? > the box breaks open and a 20 lbs pan fa

> websites should be held responsible for the data they serve Isn't this exactly the root of the section 230 debate? > the box breaks open and a 20 lbs pan falls on my foot breaking it. Insurance would cover it. If it keeps happening then costco's insurance premiums will be higher or they may be dropped as a customer. I wonder if they'll try replacing 230 with something along these lines. Imagine having to get insurance in order to host a publicly facing website. Imagine not having insurance because you're just hosting a simple blog. Imagine someone accusing your site of giving them malware. What needs to be proven? By whom? Does someone have to pay for a forensic analysis of all systems involved? Is the alternative just settling out of court? Would this be abused? This seems like a much more convoluted hell of a system. I recommend, if you don't trust google, don't use google.