4 ms·
To be fair - technology is lacking for people living in the city to be able to go off grid in a meaningful way. Disconnecting from the grid - that sounds like
by boringg 4y ago
To be fair - technology is lacking for people living in the city to be able to go off grid in a meaningful way.
Disconnecting from the grid - that sounds like there's some kind of clause in the area that you live that essentially ties you to the utility. You must live in on the pacific coast or SW.
EDIT: To all the responses - I'm talking off grid as in all functionality. Sure you can add solar / solar thermal etc though in many places it isn't cost effective and doesn't make a lot of sense in a city where the alternative is that those costs are defrayed across a large base that provides reliability and service. I don't have much love for utilities but they do provide a valuable service.
- kevin_thibedeau 4y ago> for people living in the city to be able to go off grid in a meaningful way. Everyone has a use for hot water. You can always have off-grid solar heating an auxiliary tank to take the load off the primary water heater.
- boringg 4y agoHaving a hot water heater isn't the equivalent of going off-grid in a meaningful way. You are talking about incremental improvements.
- orcajerk 4y agoThings may be different now but some cities used to the condemn the house if it did not have electricity from a provider. It is a scam, considering most people did not have electricity even 100 years ago.
- s1artibartfast 4y agoThat's fair if you're talking about all utilities in the city. Sewer and water are the main problems in an urban environment. Rooftop solar on the other hand is dirt cheap and only slightly more complicated to install then plugging in a toaster.
- boringg 4y agoActually rooftop solar isn't dirt cheap where we are. And typically requires an electric service upgrade - you also need to make sure you aren't near the end of your roof life as you'll need to upgrade your roof as well. I'm all for it where it makes sense but it isn't a blanket statement.
- s1artibartfast 4y agoI mean dirt cheap and absence of cumbersome regulations and requirements. For example, you can find panels as low as $0.07/kwh these days. My primary complaint is in agreement; solar is not cheap once you take them into account
- coffeebeqn 4y agoWhat period of time is that kWh over?
- s1artibartfast 4y agokWh/kh :P That is to say, 7 cents per watt or 7 grand for a 10 KW array
- boringg 4y agoSolar is typically quoted as $ / Watt. For reference what you quoted was 0.7 $/Watt not 7 cents. While the cost of the panels has dropped - you still have balance of system and, yes, the unbelievably high interconnection costs (location dependent)
- s1artibartfast 4y agoI totally agree and fixed it in the post you responded to. At the end of the day a panels and electronics are a minor contribution to the project cost. I think in most of California it is still legal to do home electrical work, provided it is permitted and inspected, but I'm not sure if this is true for solar as well.