3 ms·
No. Absolutely not. These are drugs that we do not see in high quantities in nature, JUST LIKE SUCROSE. This is a whole 'nother industry with the same bad inte
by FollowingTheDao 4y ago
No. Absolutely not. These are drugs that we do not see in high quantities in nature, JUST LIKE SUCROSE.
This is a whole 'nother industry with the same bad interest; their profit. They aim to serve people pleasures over their health.
Just eat natural foods, it's not hard.
- sitzkrieg 4y agoits not hard if you can afford it
- FollowingTheDao 4y agoI am homeless and live in a minivan on disability and I can afford it.
- autoexec 4y agoIf you've got a healthy diet plan that homeless people can follow I'd like to know. What is your typical diet in a day? How much are you spending on food? How are you cooking it and how much of your time is spent preparing for/cooking/cleaning up after meals?
- FollowingTheDao 4y agoCanned seafood in olive oil, rice rice pasta, gluten free bread, potatoes, some veggies but not much, and I do not eat a lot, maybe 1800 calories a day. This is healthy for me though, genetics....
- Tarq0n 4y agoThat's just the appeal to nature fallacy. When people talk about natural food the main benefit is the lack of processing for palatability and heterogeneity (varied eating). There's no reason why molecules occurring in nature would automatically be healthier.