4 ms·
I'm looking forward to the inevitable discussions about cross-origin requests, same-origin policy and all that jazz. Having implemented SPDY/2, they could do a
by metabrew 15y ago
I'm looking forward to the inevitable discussions about cross-origin requests, same-origin policy and all that jazz.
Having implemented SPDY/2, they could do a lot worse than just ratifying SPDY (v3 by now..) and perhaps clarify some of the CORS stuff.
- alexchamberlain 15y agoI love the idea of SPDY, but I would really like to see an open source (transparent) proxy, then I could proxy all my internet traffic through the cloud.
- mburns 15y agoNot quite what you want, but a good DefCon talk with code about making a 'real' session layer. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aakzkrl-34g http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aakzkrl-34g
- 0xABADC0DA 15y agoNot sure why everybody is so ecstatic about Spdy... it has a bunch of warts, like for instance the shared dictionary for HTTP headers that saves a couple hundred bytes over connections that may send several MiB (pointless compression, complexity). Also the whole concept of priorities, cancelled requests still filling up network buffers, etc. A committee of experts is how a new protocol like this should be developed, and I fully expect whatever they come up with to be better designed and considered than Spdy.