3 ms·

What wireless technology would you recommend instead then?

• worik 4y ago
  none, of course
  • zamnos 4y ago
    Lol ok. Meanwhile the rest of the industry is moving on. I mean, how do you even do an wired connection to a drone? A lot of times guitarists will perform on a stage and the clients wants aerial views without the cost of a crane. Do you just tell them you can't do it and have them go with a different company?
    • pdntspa 4y ago
      With special nonstandard proprietary wireless protocols is the answer you're looking for. The same shit wireless stage mics use. Or control over cellular data. I can guarantee you they aren't pairing them to a 802.11 router. Lol ok.
    • bacon_waffle 4y ago
      I'm a little confused by this thread - it seems like you suggest that the drone should be controlled by the SBC in an effects pedal, that the guitarist is using to provide low-latency audio processing? As a techie and perpetual-intermediate musician, that seems a bit odd... But, incidentally, at my day job I'm working on an embedded Linux system where audio latency matters, and which may well wind up with a WiFi radio (where latency probably doesn't matter so much). So, I'd like to understand issues in this space.