I don't really understand, sorry. Is this a sort of Chinese Room argument? Because we can see the workings of an LLM, and all it's doing is predicting the next

I don't really understand, sorry. Is this a sort of Chinese Room argument? Because we can see the workings of an LLM, and all it's doing is predicting the next character (moving "slips of paper" around in Searle's original version), clearly it's not intelligent and can never be intelligent? If so, that's not so much moving the goalposts as hiding the goalposts.