> my take away is that any LLM that can behave "good" must also be able to behave "badly"; philosophically, because it's not possible to encode "good" without s

> my take away is that any LLM that can behave "good" must also be able to behave "badly"; philosophically, because it's not possible to encode "good" without somehow "accidentally" but unavoidably also encoding "bad/evil". That's a really good non-technical summary of the OP's hypothesis. Thanks!