3 ms·
It’s not, but the “beauty” of NAT is that you have an extra line of defense because of its limitations. Port bindings and upnp are far less impactful and less c
by jbverschoor 4y ago
It’s not, but the “beauty” of NAT is that you have an extra line of defense because of its limitations.
Port bindings and upnp are far less impactful and less common.
- viraptor 4y agoI'm not talking about preconfigured port mapping. I'm taking about bindings as in entries in NAT. That happens on every outbound connection and has stateful processing. We're still finding issues with it, like the relatively recent NAT Slipstream vulnerability.