4 ms·
I've heard much fuss about 4), but i'm still skeptical. Google makes most their money on commercial searches such as "what is the best TV", or "where to buy foo
by missedthecue 4y ago
I've heard much fuss about 4), but i'm still skeptical. Google makes most their money on commercial searches such as "what is the best TV", or "where to buy football tickets", not "please do my homework". And AI will have a hard time returning superior results on the former, because many people are looking for human reviews rather than an AI output.
In this sense, Amazon ads will continue to a threaten Google, but not some future edition of ChatGPT.
- foepys 4y ago> human reviews rather than an AI output AI will very soon be perfectly capable of generating human sounding reviews. It just needs to "dumb down" the tone a bit to be believable.
- missedthecue 4y agoBut no one wants that. ChatGPT can already produce a good 500 word review of a TV, I can ask it to do that right now, but that's totally non-valuable.
- foepys 4y agoDefinitely but would you be able to tell if a review you see is generated or written by a human? We will have to face a reality where nothing on the internet can be trusted. Ironically traditional news outlets will probably become more relevant again.
- arky527 4y agoUnless those traditional news outlets use LLMs to write stories for them in order to keep up with the internet/lower salary cost
- DeathArrow 4y ago>In this sense, Amazon ads will continue to a threaten Google, but not some future edition of ChatGPT. Maybe a future edition of ChatGPT can discern a real human review from a content farm returned by Google Search.