I share the author's concern about company-sponsored groups, but I'm not impressed when the article starts out by citing the "robust literature" that employees

I share the author's concern about company-sponsored groups, but I'm not impressed when the article starts out by citing the "robust literature" that employees can only be productive for under 3 hours a day. Robust literature? A deals website in the UK did a survey of its customers during the pandemic and announced that people work on average 2 hours 53 minutes per day[0]. I can imagine no more robust source of hard data on human potential than a blog post about a self-reported survey from the marketing team of a deals and coupons website during a pandemic. But hey, I'm sure they got great SEO on the article and have great coupons and discounts on stuff. Don't cheapen your points by pulling in a bunch of nonsense "statistics" to try to back them up. [0]The firm that did the survey doesn't even seem to have any live links to their "report". The best contemporary discussion I can find of it is https://www.strategy.rest/?p=3169 https://www.strategy.rest/?p=3169