That sounds like you're claiming that scientists must be ignorant in all things. That can't be productive. A scientist must be incredibly knowledgeable in some

That sounds like you're claiming that scientists must be ignorant in all things. That can't be productive. A scientist must be incredibly knowledgeable in some things so that they can advance the world's understanding in things that they're ignorant about. They also must be willing to uproot their assumptions, if the evidence points that way. But they still must be experts in their assumptions.