3 ms·
I think the most important thing it is cost, and how cheap they are. what if they were cheap enough to produce to be replacable. If you can just stick on a di
by ardit33 18y ago
I think the most important thing it is cost, and how cheap they are.
what if they were cheap enough to produce to be replacable.
If you can just stick on a display like a wall paper, in any surface, and if it was cheap, people wouldn't mind replacing them every 10,000 hrs. of usage. (If you watch 10 hrs a day, that's almost 3 years).
- jumper 18y agoI wonder if OLEDs break down more or less independent of usage anyways like how a lithium ion battery can wear out faster from use, but is still wearing out even if you don't use it.
- pmjordan 18y agoThat's certainly the impression I've taken away from reading a bunch of articles on OLED displays. The failure rate is apparently still high enough (at decent yields) that they're not practical yet, and unlike back-lit LCD displays, individual pixels degrade at different rates, which is pretty bad for obvious reasons.
- jumper 18y agoYeah, I think blue breaks down the fastest color wise. I suppose it might be because the emitted light would have higher energy than red or green.