5 ms·
Expanding and institutionalising the current situation will only serve to entrench it even further and make it practically impossible to move away from. I would
by krono 4y ago
Expanding and institutionalising the current situation will only serve to entrench it even further and make it practically impossible to move away from. I would not call this a positive development. Not even in the slightest.
- lovich 4y agoFor some reason governments tend not to be proponent's of anarchy. Couldn't imagine why.
- krono 4y agoThat is not at all what I'm proposing and I'm honestly baffled as to how you ever came to that conclusion. Surely you can imagine the possibility of us coming up with systems and processes that are both non-anarchic as well as different from what we have today.
- lovich 4y agoI took your comments to be against the government being involved in this process at all, and I cannot imagine a way that system would work. If you have an alternative system that is not sans government I would be interested in hearing it.
- JPKab 4y agoConsidering you wanted the government to confine people to their homes a year ago for not receiving the covid vaccine (even if they had natural immunity), I'm not at all surprised that you want the government to be more involved. Some people are just wired to want to have a parental figure that tells everyone else what to do.
- JPKab 4y agoThe user you are replying to has an authoritarian nature. See this thread where he extolled the virtues of confining people who didn't get the covid vaccine to their homes, and insisted that natural immunity wasn't a thing: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30120181 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30120181