3 ms·
Avtually, he is correct and you are badly misunderstanding the U.S. position of strategic ambiguity [0]. The PRC and the ROC believed for decades and each one c
by infamia 4y ago
Avtually, he is correct and you are badly misunderstanding the U.S. position of strategic ambiguity [0]. The PRC and the ROC believed for decades and each one claimed that they are both the one true China and the other is an imposter. The US agrees that there is one true China, but they won't say which one. Confusing? That's pretty much the point.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Policy_of_deliberate_ambiguity https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Policy_of_deliberate_ambigui...
- yogthos 4y agoThat's complete and utter nonsense because US has formal relations with PRC and does not have formal relations with ROC.
- midoridensha 4y agoYet the US sells arms to Taiwan, sends politicians to visit, conducts freedom-of-navigation exercises in the strait, etc. "Formal relations" are meaningless, they're just lip service.
- yogthos 4y agoYes, US does extraordinary levels of interference in China completely contrary to international law and accepted norms. This is something US would never accept done on its own territory. US simply does whatever it wants ignoring any and all international norms. And if people in US had a shred of decency then they would be horrified by the fact that their country behaves in this fashion.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]