3 ms·
> Are you suggesting they paywall the chronological feed that's been free for 16 years? Yes. It's not very nice, but there is nothing that'll prevent them from
by wolpoli 4y ago
> Are you suggesting they paywall the chronological feed that's been free for 16 years?
Yes. It's not very nice, but there is nothing that'll prevent them from doing this.
> It's too late. Twitter killed the custom clients, and the client developers have (angrily) abandoned them. That bridge has been burned entirely. The devs would never be dumb enough to trust Twitter again.
That's true. But some might come back, for example, if Twitter takes some of the Twitter Blue revenue and, say, give 20 cents per month for each Twitter Blue users that sign in through a list of sanctioned app. Yes, Twitter would have been in a better position if they didn't burn the bridge.
- lapcat 4y ago> there is nothing that'll prevent them from doing this Except user exodus > if Twitter takes some of the Twitter Blue revenue and, say, give 20 cents per month for each Twitter Blue users that sign in through a list of sanctioned app "Starting today, Twitter will share ad revenue with creators for ads that appear in their reply threads" "To be eligible, the account must be a subscriber to Twitter Blue Verified" https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1621544497388875777 https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1621544497388875777 This was announced a month ago but never actually happened. In effect, a lie. Twitter can't be trusted. https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/3/23623927/twitter-blue-ad-revenue-one-month-missing https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/3/23623927/twitter-blue-ad-r...