3 ms·
NAT64 doesn't work if the connection is made to a hardcoded IP(v4) address rather than DNS entry, and that's way more common than you'd think! Thus why 464XLAT
by cmeacham98 4y ago
NAT64 doesn't work if the connection is made to a hardcoded IP(v4) address rather than DNS entry, and that's way more common than you'd think! Thus why 464XLAT and similar exist.
- zamadatix 4y agoAbsolutely but CG-NAT would be NAT444 (i.e. double NAT to dual stack) not NAT64. I mean they probably did try NAT64 based on the description of the botched 1st attempt but CG-NAT would have negated the need for NAT64 in the first place. Putting a x464 CLAT that can gateway/NAT the local network everywhere would definitely achieve the same functional goal though, just more ISP devices.