4 ms·
It's very valid to sell premium blocks/packs. It's really amazing to have all the rest in the MIT version open-core. Thanks for that and don't be demoralized by
by js4ever 4y ago
It's very valid to sell premium blocks/packs. It's really amazing to have all the rest in the MIT version open-core. Thanks for that and don't be demoralized by some comments, we don't all think the same.
- petersirka 4y agoThank you a lot!
- sneak 4y agoLicensing only part of your software under free software licenses is a clear statement that you do not believe in software freedoms for users. A proprietary software house that releases some free software is still a proprietary software operation.
- tluyben2 4y agoSomewhere else in this thread I asked for the list of licenses as I see most of these products keep the parts with the most work closed or under a license that many companies won’t touch (agpl or n2n license). It seems that almost everything is MIT; that is pretty refreshing for something like this. Check alternative solutions and you’ll find trivial parts open sourced and the hard parts proprietary or unusable in other software because of the license choice. Kudos to the team of total.js. Who cares if they offer some paid stuff; because of the MIT license anyone can. If they don’t do it, someone else can and offer it all the same. As long as vital parts remain MIT, I cannot see how this is a proprietary software operation. Tl;dr I agree with you, but I don’t see that being the case here