> clear violation of HN rules Sorry. Also, it’s not directed at you but rather someone who would deny another what they knew to be good medicine. It would be v

> clear violation of HN rules Sorry. Also, it’s not directed at you but rather someone who would deny another what they knew to be good medicine. It would be valid, in that case, would it not? (Still against the rules, I guess. I wouldn’t mind being banned for accurately labeling a sociopath; that would be a decent signal to spend my time elsewhere.) You actually believe therapy to be a complete farce, which I hadn’t comprehended before this point. Read some systematic literature review abstracts. Parse some statistics. Ask a physician you trust to explain it to you. Research doesn’t suggest that therapy improves the lives of everyone but rather that it’s effective treatment for disease. You could similarly find papers that say the same thing about acupuncture or chiropractors: when I say “research” here, I’m referring to many orders of magnitudes more psychology papers. Tens of thousands would pass your replication crisis criticism criteria.