4 ms·
If you don't build the technology then it can't be used against you. If you do build it then you need to build in effective controls so that you can limit or mi
by doodlebugging 4y ago
If you don't build the technology then it can't be used against you. If you do build it then you need to build in effective controls so that you can limit or minimize these types of undesirable impacts.
None of these things - AI, software to remotely track users, etc needs to exist. We were doing fine without it and the potential for abuse is so high that there should be a pause on adoption until stakeholders, including ordinary citizens, have an opportunity to legislate concrete protections for privacy.
- vkou 4y ago> None of these things - AI, software to remotely track users, etc needs to exist. Overfishing doesn't need to exist either, but unfortunately we live in a world where it does.
- doodlebugging 4y agoThis is true and we have to have processes in place to understand who is responsible for the fishery destruction and to prohibit their activities, levying penalties and jail time for the most egregious violators.
- notahacker 4y agoWe have processes in place, although a Louisiana court just ruled the main one unconstitutional, mainly on privacy grounds...
- doodlebugging 4y agoLouisiana. Pretty funny. I'm sure given the history of politics in the state that keeping things private is a high priority. Don't feed the prosecutors unless they're your kin and in that case, invite them for some gumbo.
- dzhiurgis 4y agoAmazing. Private businesses have been tracking everyone for decades, but when it's gov trying to solve life-threatening problems - it suddenly becomes privacy issue.