4 ms·
Yes, hence the "should". Just because something exists doesn't mean it is always justified or sensible.
by shaan7 4y ago
Yes, hence the "should". Just because something exists doesn't mean it is always justified or sensible.
- steponlego 4y agoWho are you to judge them though? Seems like a colonizer’s attitude.
- shaan7 4y agoI am not in a position to judge them. I am asking _you_ why you believe religion is a good basis to define a country.
- steponlego 4y agoI’m a Christian, it’s right in our Bible. God divided the nations. For most of the history of nations, division along ethnic and religious lines wasn’t controversial and was in fact the default. You’ll find large numbers of Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, and Buddhists among others who agree. Perhaps, the vast majority of all of them. It might not sound that progressive but nobody ever told us what we’re progressing towards, that’s a whole separate problem though.
- selimthegrim 4y agoYou might want to Google "Ganga-Jamni tehzeeb" and "composite culture" and read a little and then get back to us here. And by the way my family lived that, it wasn't some academic thing historians cooked up.
- tw600040 4y agoIt's like weapons policy. If country A is going to have them country B will be foolish not to have them.