IMO if you're thinking in terms of eventual consistency then that's a very different outlook to the one described above. There is also: - Extraverted Thinking

IMO if you're thinking in terms of eventual consistency then that's a very different outlook to the one described above. There is also: - Extraverted Thinking which is also relatively careful, reasoned and logical but puts more emphasis on external validity than internal consistency. - Introverted intuition which is faster, more intuitive mode of thinking which some people might see as logical but isn't really. It's logical in the way ChatGPT is logical: it works until it doesn't. Note also that nobody is using just one of these functions. So it's normal to lead with an intuitive thought and then back that up with logic or vice versa. But I stand by the idea that you either be fast XOR fully reasoned. You can still be "kinda fast" and reasoned (but you'll never be as fast as intuitive judgements that are close to instant), and you can be pretty accurate with fast intuitive thought (but you'll never be as assured as a more thoroughly reasoned position - sometimes your intuition will lead you astray).