3 ms·
In case you need a nudge from another very happy kagi user, consider trying it out. I used kagi for a few months when it was still in beta (and thus free) and
by Version467 4y ago
In case you need a nudge from another very happy kagi user, consider trying it out.
I used kagi for a few months when it was still in beta (and thus free) and had to decide if I wanted to pay for it to keep using it, or go back to ad supported internet search.
After wincing at the price for a bit I realised that my expectations for how much search should cost were all based on free ad supported search engines. The value I derive from a good search engine is enormous, and easily visible if you imagine the internet without it.
This makes paying for kagi a nobrainer. Their search results are really good and they have an incentive to keep it that way.
It's a solid product, with a great value proposition (if you recalibrate your expectation) and I am also regularly reminded that this is how to actually vote with your wallet. I feel like we need kagi (or something like it) to succeed. If it turns out that paid search is not a viable business, then what chance do we have left for a search engine that has its intentions aligned with its users?
But it's first and foremost a great experience. Fast, great results, clean layout and a bunch of nice user-centric features on top.
The idealism just helps to accept a cost.
- disqard 4y agoSeconding (as a paying consumer) -- sign up for a month and try the experience for yourself. It shows you the alternative Internet (ad-free, spam free, SEO-crap listicles not on the results page) that everyone here is constantly carping about missing. If you want this reality, pay for it to help it exist. Else, put up with ads.