6 ms·
I can't remember a major service nosediving so monumentally in such a short period of time. Just a steady degradation of service.
by nkozyra 4y ago
I can't remember a major service nosediving so monumentally in such a short period of time.
Just a steady degradation of service.
- edgyquant 4y agoAt this rate it’ll be Reddit-tier by EOY
- nkozyra 4y ago> At this rate it’ll be Reddit-tier by EOY I don't spend enough time on Reddit for that to really resonate, but the badges and icons flying all over the place and talk of Twitter Gold (or whatever they're calling it) do feel very Reddit-esque these days.
- Zetice 4y agoReddit is fine? Not sure what this means…
- sleepybrett 4y agoI mean, reddit certainly has more downtime that twitter, historically over the last say 5 years. At least once a week i'm met with the 'trippin' out snoo for a few minutes.
- jurassicfoxy 4y agoReddit crashes almost weekly it seems. Search is completely broken. The site's UI (new, not old.reddit) is truly atrocious.
- bradwood 4y agoAnd when it's not crashed it's slow as cold shit.
- flutas 4y ago> And when it's not crashed it's slow as cold shit. And stale. When they changed algos in ~2016(?) to try and stop certain subs I swear it got stale and feels like it updates on a cron job once a day anymore.
- Maken 4y agoI hope they never remove "old" reddit.
- bhaak 4y agoReddit's search was never unbroken, though. So business as usual.
- ModernMech 4y agoSearch is and always has been broken on Reddit. I think it’s intentional, because nothing can be so bad for so long in accident.
- Zetice 4y agoI’m in what is likely the top 1% of Reddit users by volume (I have a problem, send help), and I have absolutely no clue what you’re talking about. Further, as a dev of 15 years, I’m not even sure what you mean by “crash” here. Are you saying that Reddit serves exclusively 500s or timeouts for a sustained period of time on a weekly basis? Or that it serves more than zero 500s at some point during a given week? Or that you, personally, encounter an issue of any kind over a week? So many ways to describe “crashes” that yeah, by some definitions it probably does, but “can’t use the service” such as what Twitter is experiencing, I don’t think that’s accurate.
- pictur 4y agoThere is no need for such complex definitions. Reddit is a site that you will probably get an error on if you visit it several times a day.
- not_a_shill 4y agoThere is no way you haven't noticed reddit's servers getting overloaded. It happens fairly frequently and has for the last decade. https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/2trmnk/why_is_reddits_servers_getting_so_overloaded/ https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/2trmnk/why_is... (See: all the people agreeing) One of the triggers used to be that if a thread got too many comments it would bring down the website. So sports communities had to start splitting up their game threads during massive events so Reddit wouldn't break. It definitely used to happen more often, but it was doing it for me yesterday coincidentally.
- pixl97 4y agoThings fail slower then faster than people expect. Lots of people were waiting with baited breath for Twitter to fail the first week Musk bought it, but most of the failure conditions had been automated away... Instead the reliability loss creep happened more slowly. The people that understood the edge conditions in the system were fired. Then new changes need implemented and the old, now not understood systems, were ripped out and new pieces put in. And lo and behold they have tons of failure conditions and edge cases that can knock out the system. Even if your programming team wrote immaculate documentation on all these edge conditions, it can take an immense amount of time to both read them, and then fully understand them, and when you have a micromanager breathing down your neck for changes 10 minutes ago this is what happens.