> The truth of statement may be something that functionalism or parallelism advocates don't want to hear - the so called Parallelism Revolution will never come,

> The truth of statement may be something that functionalism or parallelism advocates don't want to hear - the so called Parallelism Revolution will never come, at least not in it's current incarnation. Do you want to bet everything on a possible advancement of technology, rather than invest in developing better parallelization paradigms? Even now, the state of the art is far beyond manually managing locks and so on.